That's an intense logic algorithm. I didn't realize "vengeance" was an acceptable perimeter for overriding "morality" system code. Lol. Awesome job! Android Out for Blood!
The "ANIMAL" has no common sense, the "ANIMAL" can't be reasoned with, the "ANIMAL" can't understand being punished for what "IT" did, so logically the "ANIMAL" must be "SACRIFICED" to ensure "IT" doesn't hurt anybody never again.
A robot cannot harm a human, nor through inaction allow a human to come to harm. Once the murderer is defined as not human, allowing him to exist will allow a human (the next victim) to come to harm, therefore a robot must kill the murderer...
Asimov to the rescue again.
The "ANIMAL" has no common sense, the "ANIMAL" can't be reasoned with, the "ANIMAL" can't understand being punished for what "IT" did, so logically the "ANIMAL" must be "SACRIFICED" to ensure "IT" doesn't hurt anybody never again.
Asimov to the rescue again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_robotics